Current:Home > ScamsOregon Supreme Court to decide if GOP senators who boycotted Legislature can run for reelection -VitalWealth Strategies
Oregon Supreme Court to decide if GOP senators who boycotted Legislature can run for reelection
View
Date:2025-04-17 21:28:40
SALEM, Ore. (AP) — The Oregon Supreme Court will decide whether Republican state senators who carried out a record-setting GOP walkout during the legislative session this year can run for reelection.
The decision, announced Tuesday, means the lawmakers should have clarity before the March 12 deadline to file for office, Oregon Public Broadcasting reported.
The senators from the minority party are challenging a 2022 voter-approved constitutional amendment that bars state lawmakers from reelection after having 10 or more unexcused absences. Oregon voters overwhelmingly approved the ballot measure that created the amendment following Republican walkouts in the Legislature in 2019, 2020 and 2021.
In an official explanatory statement, as well as in promotional materials and news coverage, the measure was touted as prohibiting lawmakers who stay away in order to block legislative action from seeking reelection.
That’s the meaning that state elections officials have chosen to adopt. Earlier this year, Secretary of State LaVonne Griffin-Valade announced that 10 senators would be prohibited from seeking reelection.
Nine Oregon Republicans and an independent clocked at least 10 absences during this year’s legislative session in order to block Democratic bills related to abortion, transgender health care and guns. The walkout prevented a quorum, holding up bills in the Democrat-led Senate for six weeks.
Five of those senators – Sens. Tim Knopp, Daniel Bonham, Suzanne Weber, Dennis Linthicum and Lynn Findley – have objected. In a legal challenge to Griffin-Valade’s ruling, they argue that the way the amendment is written means they can seek another term.
The constitutional amendment says a lawmaker is not allowed to run “for the term following the election after the member’s current term is completed.” Since a senator’s term ends in January while elections are held the previous November, they argue the penalty doesn’t take effect immediately, but instead, after they’ve served another term.
The senators filed the challenge in the Oregon Court of Appeals but asked that it go directly to the state Supreme Court. State attorneys defending Griffin-Valade in the matter agreed.
Several state senators with at least 10 absences during the most recent legislative session have already filed candidacy papers with election authorities.
Statehouses around the nation in recent years have become ideological battlegrounds, including in Montana, Tennessee and Oregon, where the lawmakers’ walkout this year was the longest in state history.
Arguments in the Oregon case are scheduled to start Dec. 14.
veryGood! (44)
Related
- EU countries double down on a halt to Syrian asylum claims but will not yet send people back
- 'Maxine's Baby: The Tyler Perry Story' shows how the famous filmmaker overcame abuse, industry pushback
- Watch: Black bear takes casual stroll in Asheville, North Carolina, spooks tourists
- Eating red meat more than once a week linked to Type 2 diabetes risk, study finds
- What were Tom Selleck's juicy final 'Blue Bloods' words in Reagan family
- Stock market today: Asian shares slip further as higher US 10-year Treasury yield pressures Wall St
- More than 300,000 student borrowers given wrong repayment information, Education Department says
- Spain’s leader mulls granting amnesty to thousands of Catalan separatists in order to stay in power
- Arkansas State Police probe death of woman found after officer
- Stock market today: Asian shares slip further as higher US 10-year Treasury yield pressures Wall St
Ranking
- South Korean president's party divided over defiant martial law speech
- The UAW's decade-long fight to form a union at VW's Chattanooga plant
- Thomas’ tying homer, Moreno’s decisive hit send D-backs over Phillies 6-5, ties NLCS at 2 games
- Defendant in classified docs case waives conflict of interest concerns
- Juan Soto to be introduced by Mets at Citi Field after striking record $765 million, 15
- Navigator cancels proposed Midwestern CO2 pipeline, citing ‘unpredictable’ regulatory processes
- French intelligence points to Palestinian rocket, not Israeli airstrike, for Gaza hospital blast
- Emily Blunt “Appalled” Over Her Past Fat-Shaming Comment
Recommendation
Paula Abdul settles lawsuit with former 'So You Think You Can Dance' co
Hearing in Trump classified documents case addresses a possible conflict for a co-defendant’s lawyer
Why Joran van der Sloot Won't Be Charged for Murdering Natalee Holloway
Oklahoma attorney general sues to stop US’s first public religious school
All That You Wanted to Know About She’s All That
Horoscopes Today, October 19, 2023
Michigan football sign-stealing investigation: Can NCAA penalize Jim Harbaugh's program?
A Palestinian engineer who returned to Gaza City after fleeing south is killed in an airstrike