Current:Home > reviewsEPA to investigate whether Alabama discriminated against Black residents in infrastructure funding -VitalWealth Strategies
EPA to investigate whether Alabama discriminated against Black residents in infrastructure funding
View
Date:2025-04-14 23:42:04
MONTGOMERY, Ala. (AP) — The U.S. Environmental Protection Agency announced Tuesday it has opened a civil rights investigation into whether Alabama discriminated against Black residents when handing out funding for wastewater infrastructure.
The Natural Resources Defense Council and the Center for Rural Enterprise and Environmental Justice filed the complaint this spring, arguing Alabama’s policies for distributing money have made it difficult for people — particularly Black residents in the state’s poverty-stricken Black Belt — to get help for onsite sanitation needs.
“Sanitation is a basic human right that every person in this country, and in the state of Alabama, should have equal access to. Those without proper sanitation access are exposed to illness and serious harm,” Catherine Coleman Flowers, founder of The Center for Rural Enterprise and Environmental Justice, said in a statement.
She said she hopes the federal investigation will “result in positive change for any Alabama resident currently relying on a failing onsite sanitation system and for all U.S. communities for whom justice is long overdue.”
The EPA wrote in a Tuesday letter to the Alabama Department of Environmental Management that it will investigate the complaint, specifically looking at implementation of the Clean Water State Revolving Fund and whether practices exclude or discriminate against “residents in the Black Belt region of Alabama, on the basis of race.” It will also look at whether ADEM provides prompt and fair resolution of discrimination complaints, the EPA wrote.
The ADEM disputed the accusations.
“As we stated earlier this year when the complaint was filed, ADEM disagrees with the allegations contained in it. In fact, ADEM has made addressing the wastewater and drinking water needs of disadvantaged communities a priority in the awarding of funding made available,” the agency wrote in a statement issued Wednesday.
The agency said it welcomes the opportunity to provide information to the EPA to counter the allegations. ADEM said state officials have made a priority in helping the region. The agency said in 2022, 34% ($157 million) of the $463 million of drinking water and wastewater funding awarded by ADEM went to Black Belt counties.
National environmental and social justice activists have long tried to put a spotlight on sanitation problems in Alabama’s Black Belt region, where intense poverty and inadequate municipal infrastructure have left some residents dealing with raw sewage in their yards from absent, broken or poorly functioning septic systems.
Alabama’s Black Belt region gets its name for the dark rich soil that once gave rise to cotton plantations, but the type of soil also makes it difficult for traditional septic tanks, in which wastewater filters through the ground, to function properly. Some homes in the rural counties still have “straight pipe” systems, letting sewage run untreated from home to yard.
The complaint maintains that Alabama’s policies for distributing money from the Clean Water State Revolving Fund, a federal-state partnership that provides communities low-cost financing for infrastructure, make it impossible for people who need help with onsite wastewater systems to benefit.
Federal and state officials have vowed in recent years to address sanitation problems through money in the American Rescue Plan — a portion of which state officials steered to high-need water and sewer projects — and the Bipartisan Infrastructure Act.
The U.S. Department of Justice this year announced a settlement agreement with the the Alabama Department of Public Health regarding longstanding wastewater sanitation problems in Lowndes County, a high-poverty county between Selma and Montgomery.
Federal officials did not accuse the state of breaking the law but said they were concerned about a a pattern of inaction and neglect regarding the risks of raw sewage for residents. The agreement is the result of the department’s first environmental justice investigation under Title VI of the Civil Rights Act of 1964.
veryGood! (8)
Related
- Tarte Shape Tape Concealer Sells Once Every 4 Seconds: Get 50% Off Before It's Gone
- Abortion is on the California ballot. But does that mean at any point in pregnancy?
- How Derek Jeter Went From Baseball's Most Famous Bachelor to Married Father of 4
- Pat Robertson, broadcaster who helped make religion central to GOP politics, dies at age 93
- A Mississippi company is sentenced for mislabeling cheap seafood as premium local fish
- What causes Alzheimer's? Study puts leading theory to 'ultimate test'
- They inhaled asbestos for decades on the job. Now, workers break their silence
- Henry Winkler Shares He Had Debilitating Emotional Pain After the End of Happy Days
- Global Warming Set the Stage for Los Angeles Fires
- A doctor's Ebola memoir is all too timely with a new outbreak in Uganda
Ranking
- Dick Vitale announces he is cancer free: 'Santa Claus came early'
- Robert De Niro Reveals He Welcomed Baby No. 7
- Fracking Study Finds Toxins in Wyoming Town’s Groundwater and Raises Broader Concerns
- I always avoided family duties. Then my dad had a fall and everything changed
- Tree trimmer dead after getting caught in wood chipper at Florida town hall
- ‘Trollbots’ Swarm Twitter with Attacks on Climate Science Ahead of UN Summit
- A woman struggling with early-onset Alzheimer's got a moment of grace while shopping
- Today’s Climate: July 8, 2010
Recommendation
Meta releases AI model to enhance Metaverse experience
This MacArthur 'genius' grantee says she isn't a drug price rebel but she kind of is
A $2.5 million prize gives this humanitarian group more power to halt human suffering
Real Housewives' Kim Zolciak and Kroy Biermann Break Up After 11 Years of Marriage
Federal Spending Freeze Could Have Widespread Impact on Environment, Emergency Management
Shipping’s Heavy Fuel Oil Puts the Arctic at Risk. Could It Be Banned?
Julián Castro on Climate Change: Where the Candidate Stands
Today’s Climate: July 13, 2010